Erez Shinan a98d3c93b1 | 7 years ago | |
---|---|---|
docs | 7 years ago | |
examples | 7 years ago | |
lark | 7 years ago | |
tests | 7 years ago | |
LICENSE | 7 years ago | |
README.md | 7 years ago | |
setup.cfg | 7 years ago | |
setup.py | 7 years ago |
Lark is a modern general-purpose parsing library for Python.
Lark focuses on simplicity and power. It lets you choose between two parsing algorithms:
Both algorithms are written in Python and can be used interchangably with the same grammar (aside for algorithmic restrictions). See “Comparison to other parsers” for more details.
Lark can automagically build an AST from your grammar, without any more code on your part.
Separates code from grammar: The result is parsers that are cleaner and easier to read & work with.
Automatically builds a tree (AST): Trees are always simpler to work with than state-machines. (But if you want to provide a callback for efficiency reasons, Lark lets you do that too)
Follows Python’s Idioms: Beautiful is better than ugly. Readability counts.
Here is a little program to parse “Hello, World!” (Or any other similar phrase):
from lark import Lark
l = Lark('''start: WORD "," WORD "!"
WORD: /\w+/
SPACE.ignore: " "
''')
print( l.parse("Hello, World!") )
And the output is:
Tree(start, [Token(WORD, 'Hello'), Token(WORD, 'World')])
Notice punctuation doesn’t appear in the resulting tree. It’s automatically filtered away by Lark.
$ pip install lark-parser
Lark has no dependencies.
These features are planned to be implemented in the near future:
This is a feature comparison. For benchmarks vs pyparsing, check out the JSON tutorial.
Library | Algorithm | LOC | Grammar | Builds AST |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lark | Earley/LALR(1) | 0.5K | EBNF+ | Yes! |
PLY | LALR(1) | 4.6K | Yacc-like BNF | No |
PyParsing | PEG | 5.7K | Parser combinators | No |
Parsley | PEG | 3.3K | EBNF-like | No |
funcparserlib | Recursive-Descent | 0.5K | Parser combinators | No |
(LOC measures lines of code of the parsing algorithm(s), without accompanying files)
It’s hard to compare parsers with different parsing algorithms, since each algorithm has many advantages and disadvantages. However, I will try to summarize the main points here:
Lark offers both Earley and LALR(1), which means you can choose between the most powerful and the most efficient algorithms, without having to change libraries.
(* According to Wikipedia, it remains unanswered whether PEGs can really parse all deterministic CFGs)
Lark uses the MIT license.
If you have any questions or want to contribute, please email me at erezshin at gmail com.